The other than truth
The other than truth
Post Covid
The truth is in another dimension, and the false is also in another dimension. It is not the existing truth, and it is not the existing false.
That is the idea of ”the other than truth”.
If the theory of evolution proves that humans evolved from monkeys, but humans suddenly came from another dimension and settled there,then what we have believed up until now will become a false. Whether God created humans or not is irrelevant, because it is reduced by “The other than truth”.
In terms of historical temporal continuity, truth and false are pretending only appear to be repeating their objectivity to each other on the same timeline.
If that is the case, logically, it becomes doubtful whether even the present is true. Is “1” always “1”? Is it really true for “0” to be “0” forever? This is the question that appears. In the same way, is truth itself always truth itself, is it really eternal?
Going even further, one may even wonder whether there is really a need to apply truth and false to the idea of eternity such as the notion of without end.
Is it not necessary for “1” to remain “1” forever? If logical conclusions themselves can be reduced to “The other than truth”, then no need to consider the concept of infinite time or the idea of eternity.
In this way, “The other than truth” raises various questions for existing objects.
By applying “The other than the truth”, existing inter-subject differences become clear.
That is, the object in “The other than truth” is one that transcends the dualism that anything other than truth is false.
Therefore, “The other than false” is not necessary, because by reducing it to “The other than truth”, and it means it is contained within “The other the truth”.The is the logic of “The other than truth”
In other words, the object is determined and formulated by the characteristics contained within “The other than truth”.
And this form creates a overview that is different from the form that is established from the duality of truth and false.
The starting point is to consider what happens when an object is defined as the truth, and then anything other than that object, that is, anything other than the truth, becomes the main object, and through this process, “The other than truth” is determined.
By virtualizing the main object into another object, can the main object maintain its superiority as the main object while still appearing as the main object? In other words, it is not structuring, but ordering on the time axis of perception. It means that the truth is no longer the truth. That is why it is called “The other than truth.”
Here is a consideration.
Proposition: Cogito ergo sum.
If you apply this proposition, it is easy to understand.
Is anything other than me not true? Is anything other than me false? Outside of me, there is an object that is not false, but is virtually holding the truth.
In other words, an object other than “I” does not result in a duality. It is not a duality of truth or false.
The truth that is made to appear virtually becomes a category that is not simply the truth or falsity of a single object. Another object is created, creating an object called “The other than truth,” and this process is transformed into the logic of “The other than the truth.”
If the outside of truth is the truth, then the object of truth will no longer be true and will become false, or there will only be the coexistence of two heterogeneous truths.
Whether one thinks of oneself or not, the truth becomes inside and at the same time outside.
At the same time, this means that there is no need to present the logic of truth by saying “I think, therefore I am.”
“The other than truth” of the object should become the logical object.
It is the process by which the object is perceived as true through its appearance, and how it is perceived.
And it is transformed on the time axis to destroy the objectification.
The answer is very simple.
If it comes from within, the object is reduced, if it comes from without, it becomes a dualistic, separated object if the structural phase of the object is not taken into consideration
To finalize it’s not a question of truth or false, it’s about breaking down the dualism.
That is “The other than truth.”
June 26, 2025 Tokyo
The other than truth
Post Covid
The truth is in another dimension, and the false is also in another dimension. It is not the existing truth, and it is not the existing false.
That is the idea of ”the other than truth”.
If the theory of evolution proves that humans evolved from monkeys, but humans suddenly came from another dimension and settled there,then what we have believed up until now will become a false. Whether God created humans or not is irrelevant, because it is reduced by “The other than truth”.
In terms of historical temporal continuity, truth and false are pretending only appear to be repeating their objectivity to each other on the same timeline.
If that is the case, logically, it becomes doubtful whether even the present is true. Is “1” always “1”? Is it really true for “0” to be “0” forever? This is the question that appears. In the same way, is truth itself always truth itself, is it really eternal?
Going even further, one may even wonder whether there is really a need to apply truth and false to the idea of eternity such as the notion of without end.
Is it not necessary for “1” to remain “1” forever? If logical conclusions themselves can be reduced to “The other than truth”, then no need to consider the concept of infinite time or the idea of eternity.
In this way, “The other than truth” raises various questions for existing objects.
By applying “The other than the truth”, existing inter-subject differences become clear.
That is, the object in “The other than truth” is one that transcends the dualism that anything other than truth is false.
Therefore, “The other than false” is not necessary, because by reducing it to “The other than truth”, and it means it is contained within “The other the truth”.The is the logic of “The other than truth”
In other words, the object is determined and formulated by the characteristics contained within “The other than truth”.
And this form creates a overview that is different from the form that is established from the duality of truth and false.
The starting point is to consider what happens when an object is defined as the truth, and then anything other than that object, that is, anything other than the truth, becomes the main object, and through this process, “The other than truth” is determined.
By virtualizing the main object into another object, can the main object maintain its superiority as the main object while still appearing as the main object? In other words, it is not structuring, but ordering on the time axis of perception. It means that the truth is no longer the truth. That is why it is called “The other than truth.”
Here is a consideration.
Proposition: Cogito ergo sum.
If you apply this proposition, it is easy to understand.
Is anything other than me not true? Is anything other than me false? Outside of me, there is an object that is not false, but is virtually holding the truth.
In other words, an object other than “I” does not result in a duality. It is not a duality of truth or false.
The truth that is made to appear virtually becomes a category that is not simply the truth or falsity of a single object. Another object is created, creating an object called “The other than truth,” and this process is transformed into the logic of “The other than the truth.”
If the outside of truth is the truth, then the object of truth will no longer be true and will become false, or there will only be the coexistence of two heterogeneous truths.
Whether one thinks of oneself or not, the truth becomes inside and at the same time outside.
At the same time, this means that there is no need to present the logic of truth by saying “I think, therefore I am.”
“The other than truth” of the object should become the logical object.
It is the process by which the object is perceived as true through its appearance, and how it is perceived.
And it is transformed on the time axis to destroy the objectification.
The answer is very simple.
If it comes from within, the object is reduced, if it comes from without, it becomes a dualistic, separated object if the structural phase of the object is not taken into consideration
To finalize it’s not a question of truth or false, it’s about breaking down the dualism.
That is “The other than truth.”
June 26, 2025 Tokyo
